Has Technology Kept Its Promise?
As I look at humanity, shifting in ever-faster and quicker paces, racing to reap ever more at dizzying speeds. At the same time, technology threatens to outpace our very mental capability; something is amiss. We appear bent on fulfilling a deeply held concept, a frantic technologically powered promise, which has been broken.
Whether we comprehend it or no longer, under this exceptional era we are developing, there is a subtle, however powerful promise: that we can accomplish more in much less time and thereby reap the best of lifestyles. Oh, at the start, the idea is seductive. Let’s construct a gadget that can do the work in half the time! We can paint in the morning and play in the afternoon. This works first-rate in the idea, besides its miles hardly ever practiced. No, once that extraordinary whiz-bang device is built, it’s run 24/7, running employees to the bone so that we can produce a gazillion times more in a fragment of the time! By all rights, there have to be lots of extra-human beings loafing. Or at least having the best lifestyle. But are they?
How is it that our lives are powered by machines that admittedly double in pace every two years? Yet, as a nation, we’re poorer than ever, more tired than ever, and much less able to experience existence as we know it. Who does not stroll around with greater lines on their foreheads even as the sector races? Whose stress levels are decreased way to the wonderful advances in the era? I don’t know many.
Ladies and gents, there’s a conspiracy afoot. Yes, absolutely. As a society, our process is to care about each other and enhance our first-rate existence, in my opinion, together. Still, the very era that has promised to provide this is simply doing the alternative. In reality, it is aggregating wealth into fewer and fewer palms. In an authentic feel oppressing the relaxation, developing a new kind of higher class, a “technorati” if you may, this can harness generation to their advantage.
And notwithstanding all of the nifty perks of technology, are our lives sincerely higher? Sure, we can point to improved efficiencies. Information may be transferred quicker and in larger quantities than ever, and computers can crunch numbers in ever-larger chunks.
Yet, have we ever stopped to invite? Is that constantly necessarily top? Computers enable human beings to make errors quickly. Think about that for a moment. And besides easy “enterprise profits” and expanded manufacturing, what are the tangible profits in human phrases? Are personnel happier or working as many hours as in 1960? And another crucial measure: do people experience more connection to one another, with all of the widgets for interplay?
Ironically, technology tends to isolate human beings in preference to convey them collectively. It promotes anonymity and separation by encouraging us to interface over longer and longer distances, using bits of steel and plastic for the interactions. What occurred to the warmth of a handshake? Looking at a person in the attention? Something is getting lost inside the virtual revolution, within the intangible, arguably greater essential, realm of our lives.
What is the fancy pace of the technology, without a doubt, that is making the arena more green and proper? Can everybody point to studies showing that the multiplied manufacturing and sheer extra volume of products, services, and ingredients are being circulated to those in need? Is the human family benefitting from the excess, or is the wealth being concentrated by using the ones in the role to help the providence?
Again, this solution is apparent; the human family is not reaping the advantages of technological advances, as evidenced via similar or worse ranges of poverty, literacy, dwelling conditions, and fashionable situations of people during the earth. Sure, certain segments of the populace are benefitting. Yet, we see the makings of a “digital divide” wherein the center training is disappearing, even as the ranks of higher and lower classes keep swelling, in huge elements because of technology, which aggregates an increasing number of power into the hands of those on the top. This has always been a conventional harbinger of trouble for those who care to pay attention.
And do not get me started on our fantastic clinical advances in healthcare; what passes for healthcare rightly needs to be labeled “ill-care” as it makes use of 2 predominant modes of operation: cutting and drugging. The human body does not typically suffer from a lack of cuts or chemicals. Many of the best bits of awareness from thousands of years of human survival are being summarily censored or outlawed by the ones in rate. Don’t trust me? Tsk tsk. Google it. As the saying goes, “Simply due to the fact you’re paranoid does not suggest they are not when you.”
Then, perhaps, is the planet better off for all of the terrific expanded production generation gives? Again, ha! No, the earth is hurting, likely getting a temperature, and for certain, getting stuffed valley to the mountain with more trash than ever before. See http://www.Storyofstuff.Com/ for an outstanding video. Well, er, type of. I’ve determined that we assume differently, no longer necessarily higher than earlier. We have extra capacity to multi-mission because we are continuously bombarded with the want to the system so much right now. But this comes at the price of the potential to concentrate. I’m not certain that being “scattered” is better than being “focused.”
What are social capabilities? Are our computer systems and era improving these? Evidence indicates that our new silicon taskmasters don’t have hearts. Our capacity for human knowledge, compassion, and love is not superior to any extensive degree through our technology. I may want to go on and on. The simple, easy question is, what are the benefits of this technological craze we are in? Are we honestly better off with the technology than earlier? And what is riding this insane rapid-hearth chase, and what’s it for? Or have we misplaced sight of the purpose we’re jogging toward? If it is for the betterment of humanity, we are, of course. One can constantly argue that technology is not the problem; it is the biology operating it, which is an honest point. Technology is neither appropriate nor horrific, however, in the hands of its customers. Truly, we can do exceptional matters with our new widgets, but can we? Are we? Currently, generally, now not.
