Nokia Lumia 800 Vs Motorola Droid RAZR

0
1136

This will be a thrilling duel with two outstanding smartphones of unique backgrounds. Presenting to you the Lumia 800 – the business enterprise’s first Windows Phone smartphone and the pride and joy of Nokia. This flagship is predicated heavily on Nokia’s famed built satisfaction, a first-rate OS from Microsoft, and a few Carl Zeiss magic, with the purpose of taking a large bite out of the modern-day market. The other competitor we have thrown into the area is, without doubt, a worthy adversary – Motorola RAZR XT910 shows up with a skinny, ultra-cool layout and its dual-core strength to reveal all and sundry why Android is primary. Let’s no longer waste any more time and bounce straight to business.

The first round referred to the shape and built components, and we will tell immediately that it will be tough to find a winner. Here are the measurements – Nokia Lumia 800 – 116.5 x sixty-one .2 x 12.1 mm, 142 g – Motorola RAZR – a hundred thirty.7 x sixty-eight.Nine x 7.1 mm, 127 g. Both manufacturers recognize how to put together a protracted-lasting and smooth attention device, and it’s the equal case with the two handsets in the query. The Lumia 800 gives you a sure balance and luxurious feeling while preserving in your hand and having an excellent searching polycarbonate chassis, which also works as a safety in case the smartphone is dropped. The Moto RAZR is equally long-lasting and shares many the same top-class elements as Nokia’s flagship. The one component that makes it unique is the 7.1mm thick body that could either show a bonus or a drawback, depending on the client’s choice. Both handsets function as Gorilla Glass, meaning there is no chance of damage from your keys, coins, or sharp objects in your pocket. As we noted, it is a complex spherical, and we cannot claim anything else than a draw.

Nokia Lumia 800

Display: our 2D round makes a specialty of what these smartphones must provide in phrases of their display screen technology. The one at the RAZR is genuinely magnificent – a four. Three-inch Super AMOLED Plus display screen working at 540 x 960 while presenting a pixel density 256PPI. On the other hand, the Lumia 800 attempts to maintain up, using a three.7-inch AMOLED display that runs at 480 x 800 and boasts a pixel density 252PPI. We love the AMOLED screens on each; the strong demand is low, the vibrant colors, and the whole lot appears wonderful. However, the Super AMOLED screen on Motorola’s RAZR proved brighter, worrying less electricity and offering better sunlight legibility, supporting the Android handset to win this spherical.

Power – although the Nokia Lumia 800 relies on a single-center CPU, specifically the Scorpion 1.4GHz, it is fantastic. The Snapdragon chipset also has an outstanding performance in the Adreno 205 GPU so that one can be available simultaneously while undergoing many obligations. On the drawback, the WP device handiest has a trendy 512MB of RAM, which isn’t always even respectable. The RAZR XT910 functions as a 1.2GHz twin-core Cortex-A9 CPU,  a long way higher than the only one at the Lumia. Furthermore, it additionally has PowerVR SGX540 snapshots and 1GB of RAM, making it very smooth for us to select. This round goes to the RAZR.

Without a doubt, the digital camera department should be a place where the Lumia 800 can experience like home. That’s due to Nokia’s longtime courting with Carl Zeiss, likewise present for Lumia’s 8-megapixel digicam, including automobile-consciousness, dual-LED flash, 720p movie seize, and geo-tagging. We admit it has the functionality to take some perfect pics. However, it also has a few flaws that the RAZR doesn’t have. For instance, it may show to be genuinely slow to consciousness, and it also falls flat while trying to snap impromptu pictures. The digicam on the RAZR is yet another 8MP; however, it provides an extra stable performance. It capabilities LED flash, touch-attention, face detection, geo-tagging, image stabilization, and 1080P video capture. Moto’s handset offers a 1.3MP front-facing digital camera, allowing you to video chat on the move and making the handset a clean winner of another spherical.

The software part is hard to analyze, but we will do fine. As you realize, the Lumia 800 runs on today’s Windows Phone 7.Five platforms, which proves to be an exceptionally proper OS. Not only does it have a stable basis. Still, it also gives sweets inclusive of multitasking, Internet Explorer Nine, a well-known inbox that brings all your e-mail accounts together, threaded message support, and many others. What approximately apps, you ask?! Not to fear; all you need to do is get the right of entry to the Windows Phone Marketplace and get all the apps you likely need. Android 2.3 Gingerbread is the OS that makes the Motorola RAZR run so smoothly.

It capabilities dozens of factors that made this Android version so popular and permitted much room for customization and development. The Android Market is where you’ll discover loads of desired apps. Motorola brings a few precise customizations alongside this first-class Android basis, which are likewise welcomed. Deciding which OS is better represents an impossible undertaking, as it’s hard to establish a widely widespread sample that pleases customers. The good information is that both devices are speedy and easy to apply, so no one needs to mind if we name this a draw.

To start our conclusion, we need to say what an excellent telephone the Lumia 800 is. It surely suggests that Nokia is transferring in the proper path, and we can wish that their handsets become better and higher. However, the Motorola RAZR XT910 gained more rounds and, on the whole, represents a better choice. It’s slender, mild, and reaches blazing rapid speeds thanks to its dual-middle engine. No count what handset you choose ultimately, rest confident that you made an excellent preference, in view that both gadgets are exceptional in the marketplace.